Grievance Redressal Committee
Objective
The Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) is established to address and resolve complaints and issues raised by students, faculty, staff, and other stakeholders in a fair, transparent, and timely manner. The committee aims to maintain a harmonious and productive environment within the institution.
Composition
The GRC should include members who are impartial and experienced in handling grievances. The suggested composition is as follows:
- Chairperson: A senior faculty member or administrator with a strong reputation for fairness and integrity.
- Faculty Members: At least two faculty members from different departments.
- Administrative Staff: One member from the administration.
- Student Representatives: One undergraduate and one postgraduate student representative.
- External Member: One external member with experience in grievance redressal or legal matters (optional).
Rules and Responsibilities
Meetings
- The committee should meet at least once every quarter and as needed to address urgent issues.
- Minutes of each meeting should be recorded and made accessible to relevant stakeholders.
Grievance Submission
- Channels for Submission: Grievances can be submitted through an online portal, email, or physically to a designated office or drop-box.
- Acknowledgment: Upon receipt, grievances should be acknowledged within 48 hours, including a unique grievance ID and an estimated timeline for resolution.
Initial Review and Classification:
- Classification: Grievances are classified based on their nature (academic, administrative, infrastructure-related, behavioural, etc.).
- Prioritisation: Grievances are prioritised based on urgency and severity.
- Assignment: Grievances are assigned to the appropriate sub-committee or authority for detailed investigation.
Detailed Investigation
- Fact-Finding: Gathering relevant information and evidence related to the grievance, including interviews and document reviews.
- Stakeholder Consultation: Engaging with all involved parties to understand the context and nuances of the grievance.
- Analysis: Analysing the information collected to determine the root cause of the issue.
Resolution and Decision
- Resolution Plan: Formulating solutions or corrective actions based on the investigation findings.
- Decision Making: The committee makes a decision, which may involve disciplinary action, policy changes, or other measures to address the grievance.
Communication of Decision
- Notification: Communicating the decision to the affected party and relevant parties, including the findings of the investigation and actions to be taken.
- Follow-Up: Providing clear follow-up actions required from the affected party or other parties, if any.
Implementation of Resolution
- Action: Implementing the resolution, which may include disciplinary measures, administrative changes, or policy updates.
- Monitoring: Ensuring that the resolution is effectively implemented and no further issues arise.
Appeal Process
- Submission of Appeal: If dissatisfied, the affected party can submit a formal appeal outlining their concerns.
- Review by Higher Authority: A higher authority or appellate committee reviews the case.
- FinalDecision: The appellate body makes a final decision, which is binding.
Documentation and Reporting
- Record Keeping: Thorough documentation of all grievances, investigations, and resolutions.
- Reporting: Generating periodic reports to identify trends, ensure accountability, and inform policy updates.
Committee Members
S.No |
Name |
Designation |
Role |
1. |
Dr. P. S. Subha Pradha |
Professor |
Chairperson |
2. |
Mr.N. Sundaram |
HOD-MCA |
Member |
3. |
Mr. Sanjay Gosh |
Assistant Professor |
Member |
4. |
Mr. K.Srinivas Reddy |
Administrative Officer |
Member |
5. |
Ms. P.Akshitha |
Sr. Student Representative |
Member |
6. |
Mr. Uday Kumar |
Jr. Student Representative |
Member |
7. |
Prof.G.Sreenivas Reddy |
Retired Professor |
Member |
Contact
Mail your grievances with complete details to: grievance@apgcu.ac.in